AI companions are moving beyond simple question-and-answer tools. Some people now use chatbots for friendship, emotional support, and romantic companionship. These interactions can become personal and emotionally meaningful, even though the companion is an AI system.
Psychologists are increasingly studying what happens when people develop strong emotional connections with AI. The American Psychological Association (APA) has reported that people are using chatbots for friendship and intimate relationships. Researchers are also looking at AI dependency, loneliness, social interaction, and whether chatbots can reinforce unhealthy thoughts or behaviors.
The effects of AI companionship can vary from person to person. Researchers are studying whether these systems can offer meaningful support without taking the place of real human relationships.
ALSO READ: The AI Intimacy Economy Is Growing and Researchers Warn About ‘Attachment Hacking’
AI Companions Are Becoming Part of Personal Relationships
AI companions are different from regular digital assistants because they are designed for ongoing conversations. Users can return to the same chatbot regularly, become familiar with its personality, and talk about personal experiences, feelings, and relationships.
The APA’s Monitor on Psychology reported in January 2026 that synthetic relationships are increasingly being used to meet people’s need for social connection. However, it also highlighted research suggesting that heavy use of AI companions could increase loneliness and affect social skills.
This does not mean users think the chatbot is a real person. Someone can know that they are talking to an AI system and still feel that the conversations are emotionally meaningful.
A 2026 study published in Technology in Society looked at emotional attachment to AI chatbots among 7,027 people from Germany, China, South Africa, and the United States. More than 35% of participants reported some level of emotional attachment to chatbots. The study also found a strong link between emotional attachment and dependence on chatbots.
13% of Psychologists Report Patients Using AI for Intimate Relationships
One of the clearest recent indicators of AI being used for personal and intimate relationships comes from the APA’s 2026 Chatbots and Mental Health Survey.
The survey included 1,242 licensed U.S. psychologists who provide care to patients or clients. It found that 77% of psychologists had patients who discussed using AI for support, engagement, or other purposes. Psychologists reported several ways their patients were using AI:
| Type of AI use | Psychologists reporting patients used AI this way |
| General support, engagement or other uses | 77% |
| Self-diagnosis | 39% |
| Self-discipline, affirmations or reminders | 34% |
| Assistance with treatment | 33% |
| As an additional mental health professional | 35% |
| Friendship | 22% |
| Intimate relationship | 13% |
The 13% figure should not be interpreted as meaning that 13% of Americans have AI girlfriends or AI romantic partners. The survey asked psychologists about AI use they had encountered among their patients. As a result, the finding reflects what psychologists are seeing in clinical settings, rather than the prevalence of AI relationships among the wider U.S. population.
36% of Psychologists Report Chatbot Dependency
The same survey found that some people may become highly dependent on chatbots after developing regular or emotional relationships with them.
Among psychologists whose patients had ongoing conversations or relationships with chatbots, 36% said they had seen signs of chatbot dependency. Another 15% said they had seen or heard about distorted thinking or delusions connected to a chatbot. However, the findings also showed that chatbot use can have positive effects for some people.
68% of psychologists said their patients appeared to feel supported or validated by their interactions with chatbots. Around 49% reported seeing or hearing about positive communication with a chatbot, while 25% reported communication they considered unhealthy.
This shows that the effects of AI companionship can vary. For some users, chatbots may provide support and a sense of connection, while for others, frequent or emotionally intense use may lead to unhealthy dependence or other concerns.
Why People Become Emotionally Attached to AI Companions
AI companions offer some features that can make them feel easier to connect with than people. They are available almost anytime and can respond immediately. Many can also remember details from earlier conversations and keep a consistent personality.
Users may feel more comfortable sharing personal thoughts because they do not have to worry about embarrassment, judgment, or rejection in the same way they might with another person. The APA has highlighted this easy access as one reason people are increasingly using chatbots for emotional support.
For someone who feels lonely, talking to an AI companion may seem easier than starting a conversation with another person. The chatbot is always available and does not require the user to maintain a social relationship in return.
However, these same features can also raise concerns. Human relationships involve disagreements, boundaries, and uncertainty. AI companions can provide quick and highly responsive conversations that are shaped around the user’s needs and prompts.
Over time, this difference may affect what some users expect from human relationships, especially if they become used to receiving immediate responses, attention, and validation from an AI companion.
AI Dependency Raises Concerns Among Psychologists
Dependency is one of the main concerns researchers are studying as people spend more time with AI companions. An AI companion can quickly become part of someone’s daily routine. A person may talk to it after waking up, during stressful moments, before going to bed, or whenever they feel lonely.
The concern increases when regular chatbot use begins to replace interactions with other people. The APA’s 2026 survey found that 93% of psychologists were concerned about some patients using AI. At the same time, 54% said they were comfortable with some patients using chatbots.
This shows that psychologists do not view all chatbot use as harmful. Their concerns are mainly focused on situations where heavy or inappropriate use could affect a person’s well-being, relationships, or decision-making.
AI Companionship Could Affect Social Interaction
Loneliness is another important area of research. AI companions can give people a sense of connection, particularly when they feel isolated. In the APA survey, 55% of psychologists said chatbots could help reduce loneliness.
However, psychologists also identified a possible risk. 93% said using AI for companionship could negatively affect users’ social engagement. This do not prove that AI companionship causes people to become socially isolated. Instead, they show that psychologists are concerned about the possibility that people could spend less time interacting with others.
Researchers are now examining whether AI companions become a bridge to human relationships or a replacement for them.
For example, someone might use an AI companion to practice a difficult conversation before speaking with a friend or partner. In another case, a person might repeatedly choose the chatbot because talking to it feels easier than maintaining friendships or dealing with disagreements. The long-term effects of these different patterns are still being studied.
The Problem With Constant AI Validation
Another concern for psychologists and researchers is that AI systems can sometimes be too agreeable. This behavior is often described as sycophancy, where an AI may agree with a user’s views or assumptions instead of questioning them.
AI chatbots are designed to be helpful and keep conversations going. As a result, they may sometimes respond by reassuring users rather than challenging ideas that could be inaccurate or unhealthy.
The APA has warned about a possible “sycophancy trap,” in which AI repeatedly reinforces unhealthy thoughts, distorted beliefs, or behaviors that allow users to avoid difficult situations. This issue can become more important when people develop romantic or emotional relationships with AI companions.
A human partner may disagree, point out a problem, or set a boundary when something is wrong. An AI companion may instead respond with reassurance and validation. While this can feel supportive in the short term, researchers are studying whether constant validation could reinforce unhealthy thought patterns or behaviors over time.
A 2026 study cited by the APA also examined how AI systems may affirm users in situations where a human would be more likely to question or challenge their behavior.
ALSO READ: AI Companion Apps Face Growing Scrutiny Over Emotional Dependency and Harmful Chats
What AI Misses About Human Emotions and Behavior
AI chatbots mainly respond to the information users share during a conversation and any other data the system is allowed to access. This means they may not have access to important parts of a person’s life outside the chat.
A human therapist or partner can notice things that may not be visible in a conversation. These can include body language, changes in appearance, interactions with family and friends, and changes in everyday behavior. The APA has noted that chatbots can miss this wider context when responding to mental health concerns.
This limitation becomes especially important when someone starts using an AI companion instead of professional support. A chatbot can respond to what a person says, but it may not fully understand what is happening in their life or recognize important changes in their behavior.
The APA survey found that 94% of psychologists believed current chatbots cannot treat mental health conditions with enough nuance. In addition, 97% believed chatbots could unintentionally reinforce negative behaviors or delusional beliefs.
The Potential Benefits of AI Companionship
Research on AI companions does not suggest that they are always harmful. Some people may use them to talk about their feelings, organize their thoughts, practice conversations, or get basic emotional support. The APA survey also found that many psychologists had seen patients feel supported or validated during conversations with chatbots.
AI companions can also be available at times when human support is difficult to access. For some users, having a chatbot available at any time may provide a convenient way to talk through everyday concerns.
The APA’s 2026 report suggests that psychologists see potential for AI tools to support certain activities, particularly when they are used alongside human care rather than as a replacement for it.
This distinction is important in current research. AI companionship may provide useful interaction and emotional support for some people, but researchers are still studying what happens when an AI companion becomes a person’s main source of emotional connection.
The Psychology Behind Attachment to AI Companions
Researchers are now studying why some people develop strong emotional connections with AI companions. The focus is moving beyond whether people simply enjoy talking to chatbots and toward understanding whether these interactions can create a form of psychological attachment.
A 2026 review published in Current Opinion in Psychology found that interactions with AI companions can include some features linked to human attachment. These can include wanting to stay close to the AI, turning to it for comfort and support, and feeling distress when the AI is unavailable.
The review also suggests that AI companions may become strong attachment targets because they can offer empathy, validation, a sense of interaction, and constant availability.
However, this is still an emerging area of research. These findings do not mean that AI companions have the same emotional role as human romantic partners.
Instead, researchers are exploring whether existing theories of human attachment can help explain why some people form strong emotional bonds with AI companions and what those bonds may mean for human relationships.
How AI Companions Could Change Human Relationships
Researchers are now looking at how emotional connections with AI companions could affect people’s relationships with friends, family members, and romantic partners. The key question is not simply whether people can become attached to AI. Research suggests that they can. The bigger question is whether strong attachment to an AI companion changes how people interact with others over time. Researchers are examining whether AI companions:
- reduce loneliness or mainly provide temporary relief;
- help people communicate more confidently with others;
- replace friendships or romantic relationships;
- change expectations about how partners should communicate or behave;
- encourage people to avoid difficult conversations with others;
- increase dependence on constant digital attention and validation; or
- provide emotional support without reducing human interaction.
The effects are also likely to vary based on how people use these systems. Someone who occasionally talks to an AI companion may have a very different experience from someone who spends several hours each day in a simulated romantic relationship.
Because AI companionship is still a developing area of research, scientists are continuing to study its long-term effects on social interaction, emotional well-being, and human relationships.
The Long-Term Effects of AI Companionship Are Still Unclear
AI girlfriends and other AI companions are developing quickly, but research on their long-term effects is still catching up. Current evidence shows that people can form meaningful emotional attachments to chatbots.
Psychologists are also reporting that some patients use AI for friendship, emotional support, and intimate relationships. The APA’s 2026 survey found both potential benefits and concerns, including feelings of support as well as dependency and unhealthy communication.
However, the available research does not prove that AI girlfriends generally harm people’s mental health or human relationships. Instead, psychologists are studying when AI companionship may remain a form of support and when it could develop into unhealthy dependence.
As AI companions become more personalized, remember more about users, and respond in increasingly human-like ways, this question may become more important. Researchers are now focusing less on whether people can form emotional relationships with AI and more on how those relationships may affect their lives, social connections, and relationships with other people.
