Responsible AI Use Disclaimer: The tools listed are for informational purposes. Users are responsible for adhering to ethical guidelines. Learn more.

AI Models · Compare

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Grok 3

Side-by-side intelligence, speed, price, benchmarks, strengths and weaknesses.

Anthropic

Claude 4 Sonnet

ProprietaryFeb 2026

The Anthropic sweet spot — Opus-class coding at a fraction of the price.

Open docs
xAI

Grok 3

ProprietaryFeb 2025

Real-time data via X — competitive on reasoning, 1M context.

Open docs

Head to head

Spec
Claude 4 Sonnet
Grok 3
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner75
74
Speed↑ better
Winner95 tok/s
75 tok/s
Time to first token↓ better
0.85 s
Winner0.6 s
Context window↑ better
500k
Winner1M
Max output↑ better
16k
16k
Input price↓ better
$3.00 / 1M tokens
$3.00 / 1M tokens
Output price↓ better
$15.00 / 1M tokens
$15.00 / 1M tokens
Blended price↓ better
$6.00 / 1M tokens
$6.00 / 1M tokens
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input modalities
text, image
text, image
Output modalities
text
text

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
Claude 4 Sonnet
88.5
Grok 3
88.0
MMLU Pro
Claude 4 Sonnet
75.2
Grok 3
76.0
GPQA
Claude 4 Sonnet
58.0
Grok 3
62.0
MATH
Claude 4 Sonnet
82.0
Grok 3
88.5
HumanEval
Claude 4 Sonnet
93.2
Grok 3
90.0

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Claude 4 Sonnet
Strengths
  • Best $/HumanEval ratio
  • Fast
  • 500k context
Weaknesses
  • Behind Opus on hardest reasoning
Best for
  • Production coding tools
  • Long-context RAG
  • Tool use
Grok 3
Strengths
  • Live X data
  • 1M context
  • Strong reasoning mode
Weaknesses
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Less tool-use tooling
Best for
  • Real-time research
  • Social-aware apps

Quick verdict

  • Pick Claude 4 Sonnet if you want it smarter and faster.
  • Pick Grok 3 if you want it longer context.

Auto-generated from the spec sheet. Always validate on your own evals.

Explore every model in one place

The hub has every AI model on one sortable table — intelligence, speed and price.