AI Models · Compare

OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1

Which AI model is better in 2026? Compare OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 on benchmarks, pricing, speed, context window, and real-world fit.

Quick summary

OpenAI o1 is currently the stronger overall pick for reasoning, coding, math, and context. DeepSeek R1 wins on speed, price, and open source. DeepSeek R1 remains the budget pick at $0.96 vs $26.25 blended / 1M tokens.

Overall winner

OpenAI o1

View OpenAI o1 review

OpenAI o1 wins

  • Reasoning
  • Coding
  • Math
  • Context

DeepSeek R1 wins

  • Speed
  • Price
  • Open source

Want to compare different models?

Pick any two models
OpenAI

OpenAI o1

ProprietaryDec 2024

Long chain-of-thought reasoning — unbeatable on hard math and code.

Open docs
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Open sourceJan 2025

Open-weights reasoning model that matches o1 at 1/25 the price.

Open docs

OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1: overview

OpenAI o1 (OpenAI) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) are frequently compared by teams choosing an AI stack in 2026. OpenAI o1: Long chain-of-thought reasoning — unbeatable on hard math and code. DeepSeek R1: Open-weights reasoning model that matches o1 at 1/25 the price. This OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1 comparison covers benchmarks, pricing, context window, speed, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and who should pick which model.

OpenAI o1 is proprietary with a 200k-token context window and a blended API price near $26.25 / 1M tokens (intelligence index 76/100). DeepSeek R1 is open-weights with 128k context at about $0.96 blended / 1M (intelligence 73/100). Those gaps drive most “OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1” searches — quality versus cost, closed versus open, cloud versus self-host.

Where they differ most: OpenAI o1 tends to lead on reasoning, coding, math, and context, while DeepSeek R1 leads on speed, price, and open source. Choose OpenAI o1 when you want the stronger overall profile on our scorecard; validate with your own evals before migrating production traffic.

OpenAI o1 is often shortlisted for research problems, olympiad-level math, and algorithm design. DeepSeek R1 fits self-hosted reasoning, math & code, and cost-sensitive agents. Scroll to pricing, real-world tasks, and the who-should-choose section for decision support.

People search “OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1”, “which is better”, and “OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1 pricing” for the same reason: switching models is expensive if quality drops, and staying put is expensive if you overpay. Use the winner card for a fast answer, the head-to-head table for receipts, and the editorial verdict for a human recommendation. OpenAI o1 currently ranks among frontier options from OpenAI; DeepSeek R1 is a flexible open-weights alternative from DeepSeek. If API pricing is your main concern, start with the pricing section; for multimodal workloads, check vision/audio rows in technical differences; for agents and long documents, prioritize context and reasoning wins.

Head to head

Spec
OpenAI o1
DeepSeek R1
Winner
Reason
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner76
73
OpenAI o1
OpenAI o1 leads on the composite intelligence index (76 vs 73).
Speed↑ better
32 tok/s
Winner60 tok/s
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 generates tokens faster (60 vs 32 tok/s).
Time to first token↓ better
12 s
Winner1.5 s
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 starts streaming sooner (1.5s vs 12s TTFT).
Context window↑ better
Winner200k
128k
OpenAI o1
OpenAI o1 wins with 200k tokens — about 1.6× DeepSeek R1.
Max output↑ better
Winner100k
33k
OpenAI o1
OpenAI o1 wins this row (100000 vs 32768).
Input price↓ better
$15.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$0.55 / 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is cheaper (~27.3× lower on this price row).
Output price↓ better
$60.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$2.19 / 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is cheaper (~27.4× lower on this price row).
Blended price↓ better
$26.25 / 1M tokens
Winner$0.96 / 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is cheaper (~27.3× lower on this price row).
License
Proprietary
Open source
Qualitative / categorical row
Input modalities
text, image
text
Qualitative / categorical row
Output modalities
text
text
Qualitative / categorical row

Pricing comparison

API cost is often the deciding factor in OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1 for high-volume apps. Figures below use catalog list prices with a 3:1 input:output blend for monthly estimates. Cached input, batch, and realtime surcharges vary by provider — confirm on official docs.

API costOpenAI o1DeepSeek R1
Input / 1M tokens$15.00$0.55
Output / 1M tokens$60.00$2.19
Blended (3:1) / 1M$26.25$0.96
Est. cost @ 1M blended tokens$26.25$0.96
Est. cost @ 10M blended tokens$262.50$9.60
Est. cost @ 100M blended tokens$2625.00$96.00

Cached input, batch API, and realtime surcharges are provider-specific and not always published in our catalog — verify on official pricing pages.

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
OpenAI o1
91.8
DeepSeek R1
87.1
MMLU Pro
OpenAI o1
80.0
DeepSeek R1
75.9
GPQA
OpenAI o1
78.0
DeepSeek R1
71.5
MATH
OpenAI o1
94.8
DeepSeek R1
90.2
HumanEval
OpenAI o1
92.4
DeepSeek R1
91.0

OpenAI o1 leads on MMLU, MMLU Pro, GPQA, MATH, and HumanEval, indicating stronger coding and reasoning-oriented scores. DeepSeek R1 remains attractive for production deployments on price. Raw benchmarks shortlist models — run task-specific evals before you switch.

Real-world performance

Beyond academic scores, here is how OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1 tends to split common product tasks based on catalog strengths, price, and modalities.

TaskWinner
CodingOpenAI o1
Blog writingOpenAI o1
ResearchOpenAI o1
Customer supportDeepSeek R1
Cheap API / high volumeDeepSeek R1
AI agentsOpenAI o1
SummarizationOpenAI o1
TranslationOpenAI o1
Vision / multimodalOpenAI o1
Self-hosting / open weightsDeepSeek R1

Technical differences

FeatureOpenAI o1DeepSeek R1
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
LicenseProprietaryOpen source
Pricing modeltokenstokens
Context window200k tokens128k tokens
Max output100k tokens33k tokens
Vision inputYesNo
Audio inputNoNo
Text outputYesYes
Image outputNoNo
Video outputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Self-host friendlyNoYes
DocsAvailableAvailable

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

OpenAI o1
Strengths
  • Tops MATH and GPQA leaderboards
  • Self-checks its work
Weaknesses
  • Very slow
  • Very expensive
  • Overkill for simple tasks
Best for
  • Research problems
  • Olympiad-level math
  • Algorithm design
DeepSeek R1
Strengths
  • Reasoning at GPT-class scores
  • Open weights
  • Cheap
Weaknesses
  • Slower than non-reasoning peers
Best for
  • Self-hosted reasoning
  • Math & code
  • Cost-sensitive agents

Who should choose which

Choose OpenAI o1 if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • You need a larger context window
  • Research problems
  • Olympiad-level math

Choose DeepSeek R1 if

  • You care about faster token throughput
  • API budget is the top constraint
  • You want open weights / self-hosting
  • Self-hosted reasoning
  • Math & code

Pros & cons

OpenAI o1

Pros

  • Tops MATH and GPQA leaderboards
  • Self-checks its work

Cons

  • Very slow
  • Very expensive
  • Overkill for simple tasks

DeepSeek R1

Pros

  • Reasoning at GPT-class scores
  • Open weights
  • Cheap

Cons

  • Slower than non-reasoning peers

Editorial verdict

OpenAI o1 edges this matchup — with caveats

OpenAI o1 is the better choice when you prioritize reasoning, coding, math, and context. DeepSeek R1 stands out for speed, price, and open source, making it a strong option when those dimensions matter more than raw leaderboard rank. If maximum measured performance matters, OpenAI o1 wins this matchup. If cost and control matter more, DeepSeek R1 is difficult to beat. Always confirm with a bake-off on your real prompts before cutting over.

Still deciding? Read the full OpenAI o1 review and DeepSeek R1 review, or open the full AI models table.

OpenAI o1 vs DeepSeek R1 — frequently asked questions

On our scorecard, OpenAI o1 wins overall (leads on Reasoning, Coding, Math, and Context). The “better” model still depends on your workload — validate with your own evals.

Build the shortlist that fits your stack

Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.