AI Models · Compare
GPT-5.5 vs Claude 4 Opus
Side-by-side intelligence, speed, price, benchmarks, strengths and weaknesses for GPT-5.5 and Claude 4 Opus — refreshed monthly.
Want to compare different models?
Pick any two modelsHead to head
Spec
GPT-5.5
Claude 4 Opus
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner82
81
Speed↑ better
Winner95 tok/s
50 tok/s
Time to first token↓ better
Winner0.42 s
1.4 s
Context window↑ better
400k
Winner500k
Max output↑ better
16k
Winner32k
Input price↓ better
Winner$5.00 / 1M tokens
$8.00 / 1M tokens
Output price↓ better
Winner$15.00 / 1M tokens
$40.00 / 1M tokens
Blended price↓ better
Winner$7.50 / 1M tokens
$16.00 / 1M tokens
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input modalities
text, image
text, image
Output modalities
text
text
Benchmark showdown
MMLU
GPT-5.5
90.2
Claude 4 Opus
90.0
MMLU Pro
GPT-5.5
78.0
Claude 4 Opus
79.5
GPQA
GPT-5.5
62.5
Claude 4 Opus
65.0
MATH
GPT-5.5
89.1
Claude 4 Opus
88.0
HumanEval
GPT-5.5
93.0
Claude 4 Opus
95.8
Strengths, weaknesses and best-for
GPT-5.5
Strengths
- Best-in-class reasoning
- Huge 400k context
- Strong tool use and agents
Weaknesses
- Expensive vs Sonnet for non-reasoning tasks
- Higher latency than gpt-5.5-mini
Best for
- Agentic workflows
- Complex coding
- Hard math & research
Claude 4 Opus
Strengths
- Top HumanEval
- Long, coherent outputs
- 500k context
Weaknesses
- Slower than Sonnet
- Premium price
Best for
- Long-context coding
- Tool-using agents
- Document understanding
Quick verdict
- Pick GPT-5.5 if you want it smarter, faster and cheaper.
- Pick Claude 4 Opus if you want it longer context.
Auto-generated from the spec sheet. Always validate on your own evals.
More popular AI model comparisons
One-click matchups for the comparisons people search the most.
Build the shortlist that fits your stack
Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.