AI Models · Compare

GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1

Which AI model is better in 2026? Compare GPT-5.5 and OpenAI o1 on benchmarks, pricing, speed, context window, and real-world fit.

Quick summary

GPT-5.5 is currently the stronger overall pick for reasoning, coding, context, speed, and price. OpenAI o1 wins on math. GPT-5.5 is also cheaper on blended API price ($7.50 vs $26.25 / 1M).

Overall winner

GPT-5.5

View GPT-5.5 review

GPT-5.5 wins

  • Reasoning
  • Coding
  • Context
  • Speed
  • Price

OpenAI o1 wins

  • Math

Want to compare different models?

Pick any two models
OpenAI

GPT-5.5

ProprietaryMar 2026

OpenAI’s 2026 flagship — strongest at reasoning, coding and tool use.

Open docs
OpenAI

OpenAI o1

ProprietaryDec 2024

Long chain-of-thought reasoning — unbeatable on hard math and code.

Open docs

GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1: overview

GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) and OpenAI o1 (OpenAI) are frequently compared by teams choosing an AI stack in 2026. GPT-5.5: OpenAI’s 2026 flagship — strongest at reasoning, coding and tool use. OpenAI o1: Long chain-of-thought reasoning — unbeatable on hard math and code. This GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1 comparison covers benchmarks, pricing, context window, speed, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and who should pick which model.

GPT-5.5 is proprietary with a 400k-token context window and a blended API price near $7.50 / 1M tokens (intelligence index 82/100). OpenAI o1 is proprietary with 200k context at about $26.25 blended / 1M (intelligence 76/100). Those gaps drive most “GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1” searches — quality versus cost, closed versus open, cloud versus self-host.

Where they differ most: GPT-5.5 tends to lead on reasoning, coding, context, speed, and price, while OpenAI o1 leads on math. Choose GPT-5.5 when you want the stronger overall profile on our scorecard; validate with your own evals before migrating production traffic.

GPT-5.5 is often shortlisted for agentic workflows, complex coding, and hard math & research. OpenAI o1 fits research problems, olympiad-level math, and algorithm design. Scroll to pricing, real-world tasks, and the who-should-choose section for decision support.

People search “GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1”, “which is better”, and “GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1 pricing” for the same reason: switching models is expensive if quality drops, and staying put is expensive if you overpay. Use the winner card for a fast answer, the head-to-head table for receipts, and the editorial verdict for a human recommendation. GPT-5.5 currently ranks among frontier options from OpenAI; OpenAI o1 is a hosted alternative from OpenAI. If API pricing is your main concern, start with the pricing section; for multimodal workloads, check vision/audio rows in technical differences; for agents and long documents, prioritize context and reasoning wins.

Head to head

Spec
GPT-5.5
OpenAI o1
Winner
Reason
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner82
76
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads on the composite intelligence index (82 vs 76).
Speed↑ better
Winner95 tok/s
32 tok/s
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 generates tokens faster (95 vs 32 tok/s).
Time to first token↓ better
Winner0.42 s
12 s
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 starts streaming sooner (0.42s vs 12s TTFT).
Context window↑ better
Winner400k
200k
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 wins with 400k tokens — about 2.0× OpenAI o1.
Max output↑ better
16k
Winner100k
OpenAI o1
OpenAI o1 wins this row (100000 vs 16000).
Input price↓ better
Winner$5.00 / 1M tokens
$15.00 / 1M tokens
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 is cheaper (~3.0× lower on this price row).
Output price↓ better
Winner$15.00 / 1M tokens
$60.00 / 1M tokens
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 is cheaper (~4.0× lower on this price row).
Blended price↓ better
Winner$7.50 / 1M tokens
$26.25 / 1M tokens
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 is cheaper (~3.5× lower on this price row).
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Qualitative / categorical row
Input modalities
text, image
text, image
Qualitative / categorical row
Output modalities
text
text
Qualitative / categorical row

Pricing comparison

API cost is often the deciding factor in GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1 for high-volume apps. Figures below use catalog list prices with a 3:1 input:output blend for monthly estimates. Cached input, batch, and realtime surcharges vary by provider — confirm on official docs.

API costGPT-5.5OpenAI o1
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$15.00
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$60.00
Blended (3:1) / 1M$7.50$26.25
Est. cost @ 1M blended tokens$7.50$26.25
Est. cost @ 10M blended tokens$75.00$262.50
Est. cost @ 100M blended tokens$750.00$2625.00

Cached input, batch API, and realtime surcharges are provider-specific and not always published in our catalog — verify on official pricing pages.

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
GPT-5.5
90.2
OpenAI o1
91.8
MMLU Pro
GPT-5.5
78.0
OpenAI o1
80.0
GPQA
GPT-5.5
62.5
OpenAI o1
78.0
MATH
GPT-5.5
89.1
OpenAI o1
94.8
HumanEval
GPT-5.5
93.0
OpenAI o1
92.4

GPT-5.5 leads on HumanEval, indicating stronger coding and reasoning-oriented scores. OpenAI o1 leads on MMLU, MMLU Pro, GPQA, and MATH. GPT-5.5 also undercuts on blended API price. Raw benchmarks shortlist models — run task-specific evals before you switch.

Real-world performance

Beyond academic scores, here is how GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1 tends to split common product tasks based on catalog strengths, price, and modalities.

TaskWinner
CodingGPT-5.5
Blog writingGPT-5.5
ResearchGPT-5.5
Customer supportGPT-5.5
Cheap API / high volumeGPT-5.5
AI agentsGPT-5.5
SummarizationGPT-5.5
TranslationGPT-5.5
Vision / multimodalGPT-5.5
Self-hosting / open weightsGPT-5.5

Technical differences

FeatureGPT-5.5OpenAI o1
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing modeltokenstokens
Context window400k tokens200k tokens
Max output16k tokens100k tokens
Vision inputYesYes
Audio inputNoNo
Text outputYesYes
Image outputNoNo
Video outputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Self-host friendlyNoNo
DocsAvailableAvailable

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

GPT-5.5
Strengths
  • Best-in-class reasoning
  • Huge 400k context
  • Strong tool use and agents
Weaknesses
  • Expensive vs Sonnet for non-reasoning tasks
  • Higher latency than gpt-5.5-mini
Best for
  • Agentic workflows
  • Complex coding
  • Hard math & research
OpenAI o1
Strengths
  • Tops MATH and GPQA leaderboards
  • Self-checks its work
Weaknesses
  • Very slow
  • Very expensive
  • Overkill for simple tasks
Best for
  • Research problems
  • Olympiad-level math
  • Algorithm design

Who should choose which

Choose GPT-5.5 if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • You need a larger context window
  • You care about faster token throughput
  • API budget is the top constraint
  • Agentic workflows

Choose OpenAI o1 if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • Research problems
  • Olympiad-level math

Pros & cons

GPT-5.5

Pros

  • Best-in-class reasoning
  • Huge 400k context
  • Strong tool use and agents

Cons

  • Expensive vs Sonnet for non-reasoning tasks
  • Higher latency than gpt-5.5-mini

OpenAI o1

Pros

  • Tops MATH and GPQA leaderboards
  • Self-checks its work

Cons

  • Very slow
  • Very expensive
  • Overkill for simple tasks

Editorial verdict

GPT-5.5 edges this matchup — with caveats

GPT-5.5 is the better choice when you prioritize reasoning, coding, context, speed, and price. OpenAI o1 stands out for math, making it a strong option when those dimensions matter more than raw leaderboard rank. If maximum measured performance matters, GPT-5.5 wins this matchup. If your niche constraints matter more, OpenAI o1 is difficult to beat. Always confirm with a bake-off on your real prompts before cutting over.

Still deciding? Read the full GPT-5.5 review and OpenAI o1 review, or open the full AI models table.

GPT-5.5 vs OpenAI o1 — frequently asked questions

On our scorecard, GPT-5.5 wins overall (leads on Reasoning, Coding, Context, Speed, and Price). The “better” model still depends on your workload — validate with your own evals.

Build the shortlist that fits your stack

Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.