Responsible AI Use Disclaimer: The tools listed are for informational purposes. Users are responsible for adhering to ethical guidelines. Learn more.

AI Models · Compare

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 3

Side-by-side intelligence, speed, price, benchmarks, strengths and weaknesses.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

ProprietarySep 2025

2M-token context + native multimodality — unbeatable for huge docs.

Open docs
xAI

Grok 3

ProprietaryFeb 2025

Real-time data via X — competitive on reasoning, 1M context.

Open docs

Head to head

Spec
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Grok 3
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner78
74
Speed↑ better
Winner110 tok/s
75 tok/s
Time to first token↓ better
0.7 s
Winner0.6 s
Context window↑ better
Winner2M
1M
Max output↑ better
Winner66k
16k
Input price↓ better
Winner$1.25 / 1M tokens
$3.00 / 1M tokens
Output price↓ better
Winner$5.00 / 1M tokens
$15.00 / 1M tokens
Blended price↓ better
Winner$2.19 / 1M tokens
$6.00 / 1M tokens
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input modalities
text, image, audio, video
text, image
Output modalities
text
text

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
Gemini 2.5 Pro
89.5
Grok 3
88.0
MMLU Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
78.5
Grok 3
76.0
GPQA
Gemini 2.5 Pro
66.0
Grok 3
62.0
MATH
Gemini 2.5 Pro
91.0
Grok 3
88.5
HumanEval
Gemini 2.5 Pro
91.5
Grok 3
90.0

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Strengths
  • 2M context
  • Native video understanding
  • Strong on math
Weaknesses
  • Output ceiling lower than competitors
Best for
  • Whole-codebase analysis
  • Long-doc workflows
  • Video QA
Grok 3
Strengths
  • Live X data
  • 1M context
  • Strong reasoning mode
Weaknesses
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Less tool-use tooling
Best for
  • Real-time research
  • Social-aware apps

Quick verdict

  • Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want it smarter, faster, cheaper and longer context.

Auto-generated from the spec sheet. Always validate on your own evals.

Explore every model in one place

The hub has every AI model on one sortable table — intelligence, speed and price.