Responsible AI Use Disclaimer: The tools listed are for informational purposes. Users are responsible for adhering to ethical guidelines. Learn more.

AI Models · Compare

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4o

Side-by-side intelligence, speed, price, benchmarks, strengths and weaknesses.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

ProprietarySep 2025

2M-token context + native multimodality — unbeatable for huge docs.

Open docs
OpenAI

GPT-4o

ProprietaryMay 2024

OpenAI’s vision-and-voice flagship from 2024 — still a great default.

Open docs

Head to head

Spec
Gemini 2.5 Pro
GPT-4o
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner78
72
Speed↑ better
110 tok/s
110 tok/s
Time to first token↓ better
0.7 s
Winner0.4 s
Context window↑ better
Winner2M
128k
Max output↑ better
Winner66k
16k
Input price↓ better
Winner$1.25 / 1M tokens
$2.50 / 1M tokens
Output price↓ better
Winner$5.00 / 1M tokens
$10.00 / 1M tokens
Blended price↓ better
Winner$2.19 / 1M tokens
$4.38 / 1M tokens
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input modalities
text, image, audio, video
text, image, audio
Output modalities
text
text, audio

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
Gemini 2.5 Pro
89.5
GPT-4o
88.7
MMLU Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
78.5
GPT-4o
73.3
GPQA
Gemini 2.5 Pro
66.0
GPT-4o
53.1
MATH
Gemini 2.5 Pro
91.0
GPT-4o
76.6
HumanEval
Gemini 2.5 Pro
91.5
GPT-4o
90.2

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Strengths
  • 2M context
  • Native video understanding
  • Strong on math
Weaknesses
  • Output ceiling lower than competitors
Best for
  • Whole-codebase analysis
  • Long-doc workflows
  • Video QA
GPT-4o
Strengths
  • Strong multimodal
  • Voice-native
  • Mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
  • Weaker than GPT-5.5 on reasoning
  • Smaller context vs newer models
Best for
  • General-purpose chat
  • Voice apps
  • Vision tasks

Quick verdict

  • Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want it smarter, cheaper and longer context.

Auto-generated from the spec sheet. Always validate on your own evals.

Explore every model in one place

The hub has every AI model on one sortable table — intelligence, speed and price.