AI Models · Compare

Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3

Which AI model is better in 2026? Compare Claude 4 Opus and Grok 3 on benchmarks, pricing, speed, context window, and real-world fit.

Quick summary

Grok 3 is currently the stronger overall pick for math, context, speed, and price. Claude 4 Opus wins on reasoning and coding. Grok 3 is also cheaper on blended API price ($6.00 vs $16.00 / 1M).

Overall winner

Grok 3

View Grok 3 review

Claude 4 Opus wins

  • Reasoning
  • Coding

Grok 3 wins

  • Math
  • Context
  • Speed
  • Price

Want to compare different models?

Pick any two models
Anthropic

Claude 4 Opus

ProprietaryFeb 2026

Anthropic’s 2026 flagship — best-in-class on code and long-horizon agents.

Open docs
xAI

Grok 3

ProprietaryFeb 2025

Real-time data via X — competitive on reasoning, 1M context.

Open docs

Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3: overview

Claude 4 Opus (Anthropic) and Grok 3 (xAI) are frequently compared by teams choosing an AI stack in 2026. Claude 4 Opus: Anthropic’s 2026 flagship — best-in-class on code and long-horizon agents. Grok 3: Real-time data via X — competitive on reasoning, 1M context. This Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3 comparison covers benchmarks, pricing, context window, speed, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and who should pick which model.

Claude 4 Opus is proprietary with a 500k-token context window and a blended API price near $16.00 / 1M tokens (intelligence index 81/100). Grok 3 is proprietary with 1M context at about $6.00 blended / 1M (intelligence 74/100). Those gaps drive most “Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3” searches — quality versus cost, closed versus open, cloud versus self-host.

Where they differ most: Claude 4 Opus tends to lead on reasoning and coding, while Grok 3 leads on math, context, speed, and price. Choose Grok 3 when you want the stronger overall profile on our scorecard; validate with your own evals before migrating production traffic.

Claude 4 Opus is often shortlisted for long-context coding, tool-using agents, and document understanding. Grok 3 fits real-time research and social-aware apps. Scroll to pricing, real-world tasks, and the who-should-choose section for decision support.

People search “Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3”, “which is better”, and “Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3 pricing” for the same reason: switching models is expensive if quality drops, and staying put is expensive if you overpay. Use the winner card for a fast answer, the head-to-head table for receipts, and the editorial verdict for a human recommendation. Claude 4 Opus currently ranks among frontier options from Anthropic; Grok 3 is a hosted alternative from xAI. If API pricing is your main concern, start with the pricing section; for multimodal workloads, check vision/audio rows in technical differences; for agents and long documents, prioritize context and reasoning wins.

Head to head

Spec
Claude 4 Opus
Grok 3
Winner
Reason
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner81
74
Claude 4 Opus
Claude 4 Opus leads on the composite intelligence index (81 vs 74).
Speed↑ better
50 tok/s
Winner75 tok/s
Grok 3
Grok 3 generates tokens faster (75 vs 50 tok/s).
Time to first token↓ better
1.4 s
Winner0.6 s
Grok 3
Grok 3 starts streaming sooner (0.6s vs 1.4s TTFT).
Context window↑ better
500k
Winner1M
Grok 3
Grok 3 wins with 1M tokens — about 2.0× Claude 4 Opus.
Max output↑ better
Winner32k
16k
Claude 4 Opus
Claude 4 Opus wins this row (32000 vs 16000).
Input price↓ better
$8.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$3.00 / 1M tokens
Grok 3
Grok 3 is cheaper (~2.7× lower on this price row).
Output price↓ better
$40.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$15.00 / 1M tokens
Grok 3
Grok 3 is cheaper (~2.7× lower on this price row).
Blended price↓ better
$16.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$6.00 / 1M tokens
Grok 3
Grok 3 is cheaper (~2.7× lower on this price row).
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Qualitative / categorical row
Input modalities
text, image
text, image
Qualitative / categorical row
Output modalities
text
text
Qualitative / categorical row

Pricing comparison

API cost is often the deciding factor in Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3 for high-volume apps. Figures below use catalog list prices with a 3:1 input:output blend for monthly estimates. Cached input, batch, and realtime surcharges vary by provider — confirm on official docs.

API costClaude 4 OpusGrok 3
Input / 1M tokens$8.00$3.00
Output / 1M tokens$40.00$15.00
Blended (3:1) / 1M$16.00$6.00
Est. cost @ 1M blended tokens$16.00$6.00
Est. cost @ 10M blended tokens$160.00$60.00
Est. cost @ 100M blended tokens$1600.00$600.00

Cached input, batch API, and realtime surcharges are provider-specific and not always published in our catalog — verify on official pricing pages.

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
Claude 4 Opus
90.0
Grok 3
88.0
MMLU Pro
Claude 4 Opus
79.5
Grok 3
76.0
GPQA
Claude 4 Opus
65.0
Grok 3
62.0
MATH
Claude 4 Opus
88.0
Grok 3
88.5
HumanEval
Claude 4 Opus
95.8
Grok 3
90.0

Claude 4 Opus leads on MMLU, MMLU Pro, GPQA, and HumanEval, indicating stronger coding and reasoning-oriented scores. Grok 3 leads on MATH. Grok 3 remains attractive for production deployments on price. Raw benchmarks shortlist models — run task-specific evals before you switch.

Real-world performance

Beyond academic scores, here is how Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3 tends to split common product tasks based on catalog strengths, price, and modalities.

TaskWinner
CodingClaude 4 Opus
Blog writingClaude 4 Opus
ResearchGrok 3
Customer supportGrok 3
Cheap API / high volumeGrok 3
AI agentsGrok 3
SummarizationClaude 4 Opus
TranslationClaude 4 Opus
Vision / multimodalClaude 4 Opus
Self-hosting / open weightsGrok 3

Technical differences

FeatureClaude 4 OpusGrok 3
ProviderAnthropicxAI
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing modeltokenstokens
Context window500k tokens1M tokens
Max output32k tokens16k tokens
Vision inputYesYes
Audio inputNoNo
Text outputYesYes
Image outputNoNo
Video outputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Self-host friendlyNoNo
DocsAvailableAvailable

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Claude 4 Opus
Strengths
  • Top HumanEval
  • Long, coherent outputs
  • 500k context
Weaknesses
  • Slower than Sonnet
  • Premium price
Best for
  • Long-context coding
  • Tool-using agents
  • Document understanding
Grok 3
Strengths
  • Live X data
  • 1M context
  • Strong reasoning mode
Weaknesses
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Less tool-use tooling
Best for
  • Real-time research
  • Social-aware apps

Who should choose which

Choose Claude 4 Opus if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • Long-context coding
  • Tool-using agents

Choose Grok 3 if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • You need a larger context window
  • You care about faster token throughput
  • API budget is the top constraint
  • Real-time research

Pros & cons

Claude 4 Opus

Pros

  • Top HumanEval
  • Long, coherent outputs
  • 500k context

Cons

  • Slower than Sonnet
  • Premium price

Grok 3

Pros

  • Live X data
  • 1M context
  • Strong reasoning mode

Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Less tool-use tooling

Editorial verdict

Grok 3 edges this matchup — with caveats

Grok 3 is the better choice when you prioritize math, context, speed, and price. Claude 4 Opus stands out for reasoning and coding, making it a strong option when those dimensions matter more than raw leaderboard rank. If maximum measured performance matters, Grok 3 wins this matchup. If your niche constraints matter more, Claude 4 Opus is difficult to beat. Always confirm with a bake-off on your real prompts before cutting over.

Still deciding? Read the full Claude 4 Opus review and Grok 3 review, or open the full AI models table.

Claude 4 Opus vs Grok 3 — frequently asked questions

On our scorecard, Grok 3 wins overall (leads on Math, Context, Speed, and Price). The “better” model still depends on your workload — validate with your own evals.

Build the shortlist that fits your stack

Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.