AI Models · Compare

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro

Which AI model is better in 2026? Compare Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large and FLUX.1 Pro on benchmarks, pricing, speed, context window, and real-world fit.

Quick summary

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large is currently the stronger overall pick for price and open source. FLUX.1 Pro stays competitive on several rows.

Overall winner

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

View Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large review

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large wins

  • Price
  • Open source

FLUX.1 Pro wins

No clear category wins in our scorecard.

Want to compare different models?

Pick any two models
Stability AI

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Open sourceOct 2024

Open weights, runs on a single GPU — community’s preferred base model.

Open docs
Black Forest Labs

FLUX.1 Pro

ProprietaryAug 2024

Sharp photorealism + the best text-in-image rendering in the industry.

Open docs

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro: overview

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large (Stability AI) and FLUX.1 Pro (Black Forest Labs) are frequently compared by teams choosing an AI stack in 2026. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large: Open weights, runs on a single GPU — community’s preferred base model. FLUX.1 Pro: Sharp photorealism + the best text-in-image rendering in the industry. This Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro comparison covers benchmarks, pricing, context window, speed, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and who should pick which model.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large is open-weights. FLUX.1 Pro is proprietary. Those gaps drive most “Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro” searches — quality versus cost, closed versus open, cloud versus self-host.

Where they differ most: Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large tends to lead on price and open source. Choose Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large when you want the stronger overall profile on our scorecard; validate with your own evals before migrating production traffic.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large is often shortlisted for self-hosting, custom style fine-tunes, and on-prem deployment. FLUX.1 Pro fits product imagery, realistic portraits, and ads with text. Scroll to pricing, real-world tasks, and the who-should-choose section for decision support.

People search “Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro”, “which is better”, and “Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro pricing” for the same reason: switching models is expensive if quality drops, and staying put is expensive if you overpay. Use the winner card for a fast answer, the head-to-head table for receipts, and the editorial verdict for a human recommendation. Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large currently ranks among competitive options from Stability AI; FLUX.1 Pro is a hosted alternative from Black Forest Labs. If API pricing is your main concern, start with the pricing section; for multimodal workloads, check vision/audio rows in technical differences; for agents and long documents, prioritize context and reasoning wins.

Head to head

Spec
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
FLUX.1 Pro
Winner
Reason
Time to first token↓ better
Winner5 s
6 s
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large starts streaming sooner (5s vs 6s TTFT).
Price per image↓ better
Winner$0.01
$0.05
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large wins this row (0.01 vs 0.05).
License
Open source
Proprietary
Qualitative / categorical row
Input modalities
text
text
Qualitative / categorical row
Output modalities
image
image
Qualitative / categorical row

Pricing comparison

API cost is often the deciding factor in Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro for high-volume apps. Figures below use catalog list prices. Cached input, batch, and realtime surcharges vary by provider — confirm on official docs.

API costStable Diffusion 3.5 LargeFLUX.1 Pro
Unit price$0.010 / image$0.050 / image

Cached input, batch API, and realtime surcharges are provider-specific and not always published in our catalog — verify on official pricing pages.

Real-world performance

Beyond academic scores, here is how Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro tends to split common product tasks based on catalog strengths, price, and modalities.

TaskWinner
CodingStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Blog writingStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
ResearchStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Customer supportStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Cheap API / high volumeStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
AI agentsStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
SummarizationStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
TranslationStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Vision / multimodalStable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Self-hosting / open weightsStable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Technical differences

FeatureStable Diffusion 3.5 LargeFLUX.1 Pro
ProviderStability AIBlack Forest Labs
LicenseOpen sourceProprietary
Pricing modelimageimage
Context window
Max output
Vision inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Text outputNoNo
Image outputYesYes
Video outputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Self-host friendlyYesNo
DocsAvailableAvailable

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large
Strengths
  • Open weights
  • Huge LoRA ecosystem
  • Cheap to host
Weaknesses
  • Aesthetic quality below Midjourney v6
Best for
  • Self-hosting
  • Custom style fine-tunes
  • On-prem deployment
FLUX.1 Pro
Strengths
  • Photorealism
  • Renders text correctly
  • Fast
Weaknesses
  • Closed weights (Schnell is open)
Best for
  • Product imagery
  • Realistic portraits
  • Ads with text

Who should choose which

Choose Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large if

  • API budget is the top constraint
  • You want open weights / self-hosting
  • Self-hosting
  • Custom style fine-tunes

Choose FLUX.1 Pro if

  • Product imagery
  • Realistic portraits

Pros & cons

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large

Pros

  • Open weights
  • Huge LoRA ecosystem
  • Cheap to host

Cons

  • Aesthetic quality below Midjourney v6

FLUX.1 Pro

Pros

  • Photorealism
  • Renders text correctly
  • Fast

Cons

  • Closed weights (Schnell is open)

Editorial verdict

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large edges this matchup — with caveats

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large is the better choice when you prioritize price and open source. FLUX.1 Pro stands out for specific workloads, making it a strong option when those dimensions matter more than raw leaderboard rank. If maximum measured performance matters, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large wins this matchup. If your niche constraints matter more, FLUX.1 Pro is difficult to beat. Always confirm with a bake-off on your real prompts before cutting over.

Still deciding? Read the full Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large review and FLUX.1 Pro review, or open the full AI models table.

Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large vs FLUX.1 Pro — frequently asked questions

On our scorecard, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large wins overall (leads on Price and Open source). The “better” model still depends on your workload — validate with your own evals.

Build the shortlist that fits your stack

Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.