AI Models · Compare
Claude 4 Opus vs GPT-4o
Side-by-side intelligence, speed, price, benchmarks, strengths and weaknesses for Claude 4 Opus and GPT-4o — refreshed monthly.
Want to compare different models?
Pick any two modelsHead to head
Spec
Claude 4 Opus
GPT-4o
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner81
72
Speed↑ better
50 tok/s
Winner110 tok/s
Time to first token↓ better
1.4 s
Winner0.4 s
Context window↑ better
Winner500k
128k
Max output↑ better
Winner32k
16k
Input price↓ better
$8.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$2.50 / 1M tokens
Output price↓ better
$40.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$10.00 / 1M tokens
Blended price↓ better
$16.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$4.38 / 1M tokens
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input modalities
text, image
text, image, audio
Output modalities
text
text, audio
Benchmark showdown
MMLU
Claude 4 Opus
90.0
GPT-4o
88.7
MMLU Pro
Claude 4 Opus
79.5
GPT-4o
73.3
GPQA
Claude 4 Opus
65.0
GPT-4o
53.1
MATH
Claude 4 Opus
88.0
GPT-4o
76.6
HumanEval
Claude 4 Opus
95.8
GPT-4o
90.2
Strengths, weaknesses and best-for
Claude 4 Opus
Strengths
- Top HumanEval
- Long, coherent outputs
- 500k context
Weaknesses
- Slower than Sonnet
- Premium price
Best for
- Long-context coding
- Tool-using agents
- Document understanding
GPT-4o
Strengths
- Strong multimodal
- Voice-native
- Mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Weaker than GPT-5.5 on reasoning
- Smaller context vs newer models
Best for
- General-purpose chat
- Voice apps
- Vision tasks
Quick verdict
- Pick Claude 4 Opus if you want it smarter and longer context.
- Pick GPT-4o if you want it faster and cheaper.
Auto-generated from the spec sheet. Always validate on your own evals.
More popular AI model comparisons
One-click matchups for the comparisons people search the most.
Build the shortlist that fits your stack
Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.