AI Models · Compare

Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o

Which AI model is better in 2026? Compare Claude 4 Sonnet and GPT-4o on benchmarks, pricing, speed, context window, and real-world fit.

Quick summary

Claude 4 Sonnet is currently the stronger overall pick for reasoning, coding, math, and context. GPT-4o wins on speed and price. GPT-4o remains the budget pick at $4.38 vs $6.00 blended / 1M tokens.

Overall winner

Claude 4 Sonnet

View Claude 4 Sonnet review

Claude 4 Sonnet wins

  • Reasoning
  • Coding
  • Math
  • Context

GPT-4o wins

  • Speed
  • Price

Want to compare different models?

Pick any two models
Anthropic

Claude 4 Sonnet

ProprietaryFeb 2026

The Anthropic sweet spot — Opus-class coding at a fraction of the price.

Open docs
OpenAI

GPT-4o

ProprietaryMay 2024

OpenAI’s vision-and-voice flagship from 2024 — still a great default.

Open docs

Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: overview

Claude 4 Sonnet (Anthropic) and GPT-4o (OpenAI) are frequently compared by teams choosing an AI stack in 2026. Claude 4 Sonnet: The Anthropic sweet spot — Opus-class coding at a fraction of the price. GPT-4o: OpenAI’s vision-and-voice flagship from 2024 — still a great default. This Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o comparison covers benchmarks, pricing, context window, speed, modalities, strengths, weaknesses, and who should pick which model.

Claude 4 Sonnet is proprietary with a 500k-token context window and a blended API price near $6.00 / 1M tokens (intelligence index 75/100). GPT-4o is proprietary with 128k context at about $4.38 blended / 1M (intelligence 72/100). Those gaps drive most “Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o” searches — quality versus cost, closed versus open, cloud versus self-host.

Where they differ most: Claude 4 Sonnet tends to lead on reasoning, coding, math, and context, while GPT-4o leads on speed and price. Choose Claude 4 Sonnet when you want the stronger overall profile on our scorecard; validate with your own evals before migrating production traffic.

Claude 4 Sonnet is often shortlisted for production coding tools, long-context rag, and tool use. GPT-4o fits general-purpose chat, voice apps, and vision tasks. Scroll to pricing, real-world tasks, and the who-should-choose section for decision support.

People search “Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o”, “which is better”, and “Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o pricing” for the same reason: switching models is expensive if quality drops, and staying put is expensive if you overpay. Use the winner card for a fast answer, the head-to-head table for receipts, and the editorial verdict for a human recommendation. Claude 4 Sonnet currently ranks among competitive options from Anthropic; GPT-4o is a hosted alternative from OpenAI. If API pricing is your main concern, start with the pricing section; for multimodal workloads, check vision/audio rows in technical differences; for agents and long documents, prioritize context and reasoning wins.

Head to head

Spec
Claude 4 Sonnet
GPT-4o
Winner
Reason
Intelligence index↑ better
Winner75
72
Claude 4 Sonnet
Claude 4 Sonnet leads on the composite intelligence index (75 vs 72).
Speed↑ better
95 tok/s
Winner110 tok/s
GPT-4o
GPT-4o generates tokens faster (110 vs 95 tok/s).
Time to first token↓ better
0.85 s
Winner0.4 s
GPT-4o
GPT-4o starts streaming sooner (0.4s vs 0.85s TTFT).
Context window↑ better
Winner500k
128k
Claude 4 Sonnet
Claude 4 Sonnet wins with 500k tokens — about 3.9× GPT-4o.
Max output↑ better
16k
Winner16k
GPT-4o
GPT-4o wins this row (16384 vs 16000).
Input price↓ better
$3.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$2.50 / 1M tokens
GPT-4o
GPT-4o is cheaper (~1.2× lower on this price row).
Output price↓ better
$15.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$10.00 / 1M tokens
GPT-4o
GPT-4o is cheaper (~1.5× lower on this price row).
Blended price↓ better
$6.00 / 1M tokens
Winner$4.38 / 1M tokens
GPT-4o
GPT-4o is cheaper (~1.4× lower on this price row).
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Qualitative / categorical row
Input modalities
text, image
text, image, audio
Qualitative / categorical row
Output modalities
text
text, audio
Qualitative / categorical row

Pricing comparison

API cost is often the deciding factor in Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o for high-volume apps. Figures below use catalog list prices with a 3:1 input:output blend for monthly estimates. Cached input, batch, and realtime surcharges vary by provider — confirm on official docs.

API costClaude 4 SonnetGPT-4o
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$2.50
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$10.00
Blended (3:1) / 1M$6.00$4.38
Est. cost @ 1M blended tokens$6.00$4.38
Est. cost @ 10M blended tokens$60.00$43.80
Est. cost @ 100M blended tokens$600.00$438.00

Cached input, batch API, and realtime surcharges are provider-specific and not always published in our catalog — verify on official pricing pages.

Benchmark showdown

MMLU
Claude 4 Sonnet
88.5
GPT-4o
88.7
MMLU Pro
Claude 4 Sonnet
75.2
GPT-4o
73.3
GPQA
Claude 4 Sonnet
58.0
GPT-4o
53.1
MATH
Claude 4 Sonnet
82.0
GPT-4o
76.6
HumanEval
Claude 4 Sonnet
93.2
GPT-4o
90.2

Claude 4 Sonnet leads on MMLU Pro, GPQA, MATH, and HumanEval, indicating stronger coding and reasoning-oriented scores. GPT-4o leads on MMLU. GPT-4o remains attractive for production deployments on price. Raw benchmarks shortlist models — run task-specific evals before you switch.

Real-world performance

Beyond academic scores, here is how Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o tends to split common product tasks based on catalog strengths, price, and modalities.

TaskWinner
CodingClaude 4 Sonnet
Blog writingClaude 4 Sonnet
ResearchClaude 4 Sonnet
Customer supportGPT-4o
Cheap API / high volumeGPT-4o
AI agentsClaude 4 Sonnet
SummarizationClaude 4 Sonnet
TranslationClaude 4 Sonnet
Vision / multimodalClaude 4 Sonnet
Self-hosting / open weightsGPT-4o

Technical differences

FeatureClaude 4 SonnetGPT-4o
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing modeltokenstokens
Context window500k tokens128k tokens
Max output16k tokens16k tokens
Vision inputYesYes
Audio inputNoYes
Text outputYesYes
Image outputNoNo
Video outputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Self-host friendlyNoNo
DocsAvailableAvailable

Strengths, weaknesses and best-for

Claude 4 Sonnet
Strengths
  • Best $/HumanEval ratio
  • Fast
  • 500k context
Weaknesses
  • Behind Opus on hardest reasoning
Best for
  • Production coding tools
  • Long-context RAG
  • Tool use
GPT-4o
Strengths
  • Strong multimodal
  • Voice-native
  • Mature ecosystem
Weaknesses
  • Weaker than GPT-5.5 on reasoning
  • Smaller context vs newer models
Best for
  • General-purpose chat
  • Voice apps
  • Vision tasks

Who should choose which

Choose Claude 4 Sonnet if

  • You need stronger reasoning, coding, or math quality
  • You need a larger context window
  • Production coding tools
  • Long-context RAG

Choose GPT-4o if

  • You care about faster token throughput
  • API budget is the top constraint
  • General-purpose chat
  • Voice apps

Pros & cons

Claude 4 Sonnet

Pros

  • Best $/HumanEval ratio
  • Fast
  • 500k context

Cons

  • Behind Opus on hardest reasoning

GPT-4o

Pros

  • Strong multimodal
  • Voice-native
  • Mature ecosystem

Cons

  • Weaker than GPT-5.5 on reasoning
  • Smaller context vs newer models

Editorial verdict

Claude 4 Sonnet edges this matchup — with caveats

Claude 4 Sonnet is the better choice when you prioritize reasoning, coding, math, and context. GPT-4o stands out for speed and price, making it a strong option when those dimensions matter more than raw leaderboard rank. If maximum measured performance matters, Claude 4 Sonnet wins this matchup. If cost and control matter more, GPT-4o is difficult to beat. Always confirm with a bake-off on your real prompts before cutting over.

Still deciding? Read the full Claude 4 Sonnet review and GPT-4o review, or open the full AI models table.

Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o — frequently asked questions

On our scorecard, Claude 4 Sonnet wins overall (leads on Reasoning, Coding, Math, and Context). The “better” model still depends on your workload — validate with your own evals.

Build the shortlist that fits your stack

Open every model in one place — sortable table with intelligence, speed and price.